Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label ambiguous pronouns

Analysis of "Labwork" by John A. Nieves

Original poem reprinted online here: "Labwork" by John A. Nieves Originally read: February 7, 2013 More information about the Poet: John A. Nieves I feel I'm missing important here, but I looked up Reactor Field and saw that the name referred to a a place at University of Missouri.  Then I looked up the author profile and John A. Nieve s went to the University of Missouri for his PhD.   Now does so deep of an allusion irritate me.  In some ways. yes and no.  I read the poem and wanted to know more about the place; however, now I doubt I'll get every reference in the poem and therefore, wildly misinterpret it, but hey, what's new. The first two stanzas include a "we" speaker that shows the speaker is in a group, or has a collective unconscious.  The attention to the "name" of Reactor field and the aside of mutant squirrels sets up a sort of humor  in this poem.  Observational looking for the absurd.  Absurd being observational.  Maybe both. T...

Analysis of "Geckos in Obscure Light" by William Logan

Original poem reprinted online here: "Geckos in Obscure Light" by William Logan Originally read: February 6, 2013 More information about the Poet: William Logan "Their."   Over the past couple of poems, I've been harping a lot on ambiguous pronouns.  That, if not done that well, will lead to overall confusion of subject -- for example, if there are multiple subjects should all descriptors be applicable to all of them; however, if done right, then the ambiguous pronouns set up correctly then the descriptors will be applicable to all the subjects seamlessly.  Yes, it's a fine line -- a fine, subjective, hypothetical line. "Their" in line three of the poem refers to the Geckos mentioned in the first stanza with their "shadow organs" however, this couplet still confuses me, "backs a tarnished armor studded / by the rosettes of some obscure disease."  On one hand, I understand the armor part as a foreshadow to war; however, I'm ...

Analysis of "The Drought" by Gary Soto

Original poem reprinted online here: "The Drought" by Gary Soto Originally read: February 4, 2013 More information about the Poet: Gary Soto Reverse-anthropomorphism.  Humans taking on the quality of non-living objects.  I know there's a literary term specifically for this that is not Reverse-anthropomorphism, but I can't think of it right now. I read this poem again, and then looked at the notes that I wrote in the past, "Who does 'they' refer to?" "Who is 'their' referring to?" I think for yesterday's poem I harped on the ambiguous pronoun and how they are used.  If a poem is only ambiguous pronouns I feel a sense of cheapness, like "I should know who 'they' are just by reading the poem or collective subconscious."  Most of the time I don't.  But in this particular poem, the environment defines the people "they" "their."  So in the first stanza when the speaker personifies the "cl...

Analysis of "Waiting on the Corners" by Donald Hall

Original poem reprinted online here: "Waiting on the Corners" by Donald Hall Originally read: December 25, 2012? More information about the Poet: Donald Hal l I wrote a lot of "I like" for this poem.   Funnily enough there's a lot of grammar issues within the poem that would make English majors wince.  However, grammar is a tool to standardize communication, but in a poem, miscommunications bring a sort of insight. For example the first line: "Glass, air, ice, light, and winter cold."  Even though I wrote that "this collection of verbs [they are nouns past me -- you dolt] are mundane."  There's a sense of  two things with the first line -- immediacy (the nouns are right in front of the) and disorder (without a complete sentence there is a lack of context. As we get further down into the poem there's ambiguous pronouns "They" in line three could refer to the items above or a group of people -- the line has a sense of duality ...